Melanie Wilson Rughani

Melanie-Rughani Bio Image

How do I help clients effect critical changes in law and policy?

Appellate practice and initiative petition advocacy might seem like very different areas of law. The common denominator in my practice is the combining of careful legal analysis, persuasive advocacy and an understanding of often unique Oklahoma law and procedure to right a judicial wrong, or shape law and policy moving forward.

Protecting—and helping engaged citizens participate in—Oklahoma’s initiative petition process

Melanie is one of only a handful of Oklahoma attorneys with substantial experience representing clients throughout the state’s initiative and referendum petition process, through which citizens can propose statutes or even constitutional amendments for inclusion on the ballot without going through the state legislature. She advises proponents from the earliest drafting stages through the complex statutory process and handles the litigation that follows. She is currently also defending the Oklahoma initiative petition process itself, constitutionally challenging a law attempting to curtail the ability of Oklahomans to exercise their direct democracy rights.

Helping clients appeal unfavorable verdicts or decisions, across industries

Melanie represents a wide range of firm clients in appeals before the Oklahoma Supreme Court, the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals, and federal appellate courts. She is skilled at identifying legal error, preserving appellate issues, and presenting persuasive arguments even under demanding standards of review. She has developed a particular niche appealing what are known as “jackpot verdicts”—unanticipated large damage awards.

More than holding her own against national opposing counsel

While some might think they need a large national firm to fight an unfavorable or unexpected trial result in Oklahoma, Melanie notes the state’s many unique appellate rules and procedures, as well as preservation requirements, with which national firms may not be familiar. Despite her ‘national’ resume, including a clerkship at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Melanie proudly describes herself as a local lawyer—and is always happy to collaborate in that capacity with larger firms from other states, litigating in Oklahoma.

Continuing to bet on herself when crafting compelling legal documents

With so many lawyers now relying more and more heavily on artificial intelligence to craft their legal arguments and briefs, Melanie considers her strong writing skills to be an increasingly important differentiator in her practice. While taking all appropriate advantage of technology, she prides herself on her ability to craft unique strategies and phrasing that may be persuasive to appellate judges and cannot envision herself ever ceding that opportunity for originality to a tool.

Experience

  • Represented a coalition of healthcare advocates seeking to expand Medicaid in Oklahoma, including drafting petition, advising proponents throughout complex statutory initiative petition process, and successfully defending initiative from multiple constitutional challenges in a rare en banc oral argument before the Oklahoma Supreme Court. See Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, Inc. v. Smalley, 2019 OK 48, 456 P.3d 609.
  • Represented a coalition of criminal justice reform advocates seeking to prohibit the use of draconian sentencing enhancements in Oklahoma, including advising proponents throughout the initiative petition process, and obtaining writ of mandamus from the Oklahoma Supreme Court, ultimately ensuring the measure would appear on the general election ballot. See In re State Question 805, Initiative Petition 421, 2020 OK 45, 473 P.3d 466.
  • Represented proponents of an initiative petition seeking to reform the redistricting process in Oklahoma and prevent gerrymandering, including successfully defending petition from multiple constitutional challenges in a rare en banc oral argument before the Oklahoma Supreme Court. See In re Initiative Petition No. 426, State Question No. 810, 2020 OK 43, 465 P.3d 1244; Gaddis v. Moore, 2020 OK 9, 458 P.3d 1088.
  • Represented a coalition of education associations, teachers, and parents in successful legal challenge to veto referendum petition. See Oklahoma’s Children, Our Future, Inc. v. Coburn, Sup. Ct. No. 117,020.
  • Successfully defended education funding initiative petition from constitutional and procedural challenges brought by anti-tax group, ensuring that the measure reached the general election ballot. See In re Initiative Petition No. 403, State Question No. 779, 2016 OK 1; OCPA Impact, Inc. v. Sheehan, 2016 OK 84.
  • Successfully challenged the Attorney General's proposed ballot titles for criminal justice reform measures as misleading and partial. See Steele v. Pruitt, 2016 OK 87.
  • Successfully obtained reversal of a series of orders by the Oklahoma Corporation Commission denying various rural telephone companies' requests for reimbursement under the Oklahoma Telecommunications Act, allowing providers to recover more than $1 million in costs. See Oklahoma Universal Service Fund cases, 2019 OK 21; 2019 OK 22; 2019 OK 23; 2019 OK 24; 2019 OK 25; 2019 OK 26; 2019 OK 27.
  • Successfully obtained reversal of trial court order attempting to enforce purported $30 million settlement. See Factor v. Western Express, Inc., Okla. Sup. Ct. No. 114,498.
  • Successfully obtained reversal of $15 million judgment entered as a sanction for alleged discovery abuses. See Parks v. Foremost Insurance Company, Okla. Sup. Ct. No. 112744 (and related cases).
  • Successfully obtained reversal of a $2.5 million jury verdict against liability insurer on grounds that jury's finding of fraud lacked sufficient evidence in the record. See Turbo Nitro, Inc. v. Burlington Ins. Co., Okla. Sup. Ct. No. 117,082.
  • Successfully obtained vacatur of district court's finding of copyright infringement. See Paycom Payroll, LLC v. Richison, 758 F.3d 1198 (10th Cir. 2014).

Credentials

  • University of Virginia School of Law, J.D., Order of the Coif, 2007
    • Law Review, Executive Editor
    • Dean’s Scholar
  • University of Kansas, B.A., 2004
    • University Scholar
    • Kansas Debate Team

  • Oklahoma
  • District of Columbia
  • North Carolina
  • U.S. Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit
  • U.S. District Court Northern District Oklahoma
  • U.S. District Court Western District Oklahoma
  • U.S. Supreme Court

Honors & Awards

  • Chambers USA, Up and Coming in Litigation: General Commercial (2026 - Present)
  • Named Law360 Rising Star, Appellate (2021)
  • Best Lawyers 2027 Lawyer of the Year (OKC) in Appellate Practice
  • Best Lawyers, Appellate Practice; Commercial Litigation (2021 - Present)
  • Oklahoma Super Lawyers, Appellate (2024 - 2025)
  • Oklahoma Super Lawyers, Rising Star in Appellate, Civil Litigation (2014 - 2018, 2020 - 2022)

Publications & Media

  • Speaker, “What You Can Do Before and During Trial to Improve Your Chances of Success on Appeal,” Oklahoma Bar Association Annual Meeting, November 3, 2016, Oklahoma City, OK
  • Speaker, “Civil Procedure and Federal Jurisdiction,” The Tenth Circuit Year in Review, December 29, 2016, Oklahoma City, OK
  • Speaker, “Civil Procedure and Federal Jurisdiction,” The Tenth Circuit Year in Review, December 29, 2015, Oklahoma City, OK
  • Speaker, “Civil Procedure and Federal Jurisdiction,” The Tenth Circuit Year in Review, December 30, 2014, Oklahoma City, OK
  • Speaker, “Civil Procedure and Federal Jurisdiction,” The Tenth Circuit Year in Review, December 30, 2014, Oklahoma City, OK
  • Speaker, “Civil Procedure and Federal Jurisdiction,” The Tenth Circuit Year in Review, December 30, 2013, Oklahoma City, OK
  • Speaker, “Civil Procedure and Federal Jurisdiction,” The Tenth Circuit Year in Review, December 18, 2012, Oklahoma City, OK

Community Service

  • Parent Promise, President of the Board
  • Oklahoma Bar Journal, Board of Editors