How do I counsel clients on antitrust matters and resolve disputes?

I enjoy helping people solve difficult problems. Whether I’m advising a business on antitrust compliance, guiding parties toward a resolution as a mediator or arbitrator, or teaching future lawyers in the classroom, I strive to take complex issues and make them understandable, practical and manageable. At the end of the day, I want clients to leave a conversation with a clear path forward.

Translating complicated antitrust issues into pragmatic advice

For decades, litigator and counselor Kent Meyers has advised businesses on antitrust matters, helping them steer through legal and competitive challenges while avoiding unnecessary risk. Drawing on extensive experience in both state and federal antitrust matters, Kent advises clients on what the law permits, where potential pitfalls exist, and how to structure their conduct to achieve business objectives while remaining compliant.

Known for his keen legal acumen and clear communication skills, Kent helps clients understand not only what the law requires, but why it matters. His straight-forward approach provides people with the information they need to make sound decisions.

Resolving disputes through mediation and arbitration

A substantial portion of Kent’s practice focuses on alternative dispute resolution. He serves both as an arbitrator and mediator and regularly assists parties seeking cost-effective alternatives to lengthy litigation. Kent particularly enjoys helping individuals and businesses with sharply different perspectives find common ground. By creating an environment for productive dialogue, he works to secure resolutions—including those involving high-stakes matters—so clients can move forward and focus on their businesses rather than prolonged conflict.

Drawing on a distinguished litigation background

Although Kent’s current focus centers on counseling and dispute resolution, he brings decades of experience handling antitrust and complex commercial litigation. Throughout his career, he has tried significant cases involving antitrust, intellectual property and other sophisticated business disputes, earning a reputation among clients and peers alike as a thoughtful strategist and effective advocate. His litigation experience continues to inform his counseling and ADR work, providing valuable insight into how disagreements develop and courts evaluate claims and how parties can often avoid costly litigation altogether.

Teaching, writing and shaping the law

Kent’s passion for education has remained a constant throughout his career. He has taught antitrust law and alternative dispute resolution at all three Oklahoma law schools and has taught antitrust dozens of times while maintaining an active law practice. Students consistently praise his ability to make challenging legal concepts engaging, relevant and accessible.

His contributions extend beyond the classroom. Kent played a principal role in drafting the Oklahoma Antitrust Reform Act, which modernized the state’s antitrust laws, and he has helped shape the development of antitrust law through both his writing and professional service.

Building relationships that advance client goals

Whether advising a client, teaching a class or facilitating a settlement discussion, Kent believes that effective communication begins with listening. He takes the time to understand what matters most to the people he serves, identify the principles and priorities driving a dispute, and craft solutions aligned with those goals.

Clients value his ability to remain steady and constructive in difficult circumstances. By building relationships, finding common ground, and keeping attention focused on practical outcomes, Kent helps clients address complex challenges with confidence.

Contributing to the profession and the community

The recipient of numerous awards, an author with more than a dozen published articles, a frequent lecturer and a leader in the legal profession, Kent also cohosts The Verdict, a weekly local television show. Additionally, he’s particularly proud of his longtime involvement with Oklahoma Lawyers for Children, reflecting a commitment to service that has remained a hallmark of his professional life.

What Clients Say About Kent

Credentials

    • Oklahoma
    • U.S. District Court Eastern District Oklahoma
    • U.S. District Court Northern District Oklahoma
    • U.S. District Court Western District Oklahoma
    • U.S. Supreme Court

    • Oklahoma County Bar Association (President, 1983)
      • Bankruptcy Section
    • Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy (Board of Directors)
    • National Association of Counsel for Children
    • American Bar Association
      • Antitrust Section
    • Bankruptcy Rules Committee of U.S. Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Okla.
    • Oklahoma Bar Association
      • Bankruptcy Section (Chairman – 4 years)
      • Professionalism Committee
      • Commercial Law Committee, Chairman (1978 – 1982)
    • American College of Trial Lawyers (Oklahoma State Chair)

    Honors & Awards

    • Chambers USA, Band 1 in Litigation - General Commercial (2006 - 2011)
    • Honored by Chambers USA as a Senior Statespeople (2012 - Present)
    • 2015 Recipient of The Journal Record Award
    • Appointed by the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma to Bankruptcy Judge Selection Committee
    • Best Lawyers, Antitrust Law, Bet-the-Company Litigation, Commercial Litigation, Communications Law, Litigation - Antitrust, Litigation - Bankruptcy (1983 - Present)
    • Best Lawyers Lawyer of the Year (OKC) in Litigation - Antitrust (2012, 2019, 2021)
    • Benchmark Litigation, Local Litigation Star
    • Lawdragon, Top 500 Leading Lawyers in America
    • Oklahoma Super Lawyers (2006 - 2023)
    • Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers

    Publications & Media

    • The Lasting Impact of NCAA vs. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma: The Football Fan Wins, Oklahoma Bar Journal, October 2018
    • Professional Fees in Bankruptcy Under the 1994 Reform Act, 1995
    • Private Enforcement of the Antitrust Laws Works Occasionally: The Board of Regents of the Univ. of Okla. v. NCAA, A Case in Point (Co-Author with Ira Horowitz), 48 Okla. L. Rev. 669, 1995
    • The Creditor Trap: Scheduling Debts as “Disputed, Contingent or Liquidated” in Chapter 11 Cases (Co-Author with David L. Nunn), Quarterly Report, Conference on Consumer Finance Law, Spr., 1994
    • Oklahoma Adopts 1972 Amendments to Uniform Commercial Code, 7 Okla. City, U.L. Rev. 33, 1982
    • A Nagging Commercial Problem is Solved, Oklahoma Bar Journal, Volume 51, No. 26, p. 1605, June, 1980
    • Significant Developments in Commercial Law, Oklahoma Bar Journal, Volume 51, No. 9, p.467, March, 1980
    • Ethical Considerations in The Representation of Multiple Creditors Against a Single Debtor, The American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Volume 51, Winter, 1977
    • Multi-State Motor Vehicle Transactions Under the Uniform Commercial Code: An Update, Oklahoma Law Review, Volume 30 No. 4, Fall, 1977
    • The Oklahoma UCC
    • Real Estate Transactions, Rates and the Uniform Consumer Credit Code, Oklahoma Law Review, Volume 23, No. 3, August, 1970
    • Mortgages: Circular Priority, Oklahoma Law Review, Volume 17, 1964

    Community Service

    • Co-Founder of Oklahoma Lawyers for Children
    • Founder, Crowe & Dunlevy International Professorship Program