How do I help clients with bankruptcy and restructuring matters?

I enjoy bankruptcy law and fully understand that every successful reorganization requires solving both legal and business problems simultaneously. Whether representing a secured creditor or a debtor trying to save a company, I bring an approach that’s highly methodical, evidence-driven and built around determining from the very beginning whether a proposed path forward will actually work well and lead to enduring success. My clients appreciate this feasibility-first and long-term mindset.

Guiding clients through complex circumstances to secure optimal outcomes

Mark Craige concentrates his practice on bankruptcy, insolvency, creditor’s rights matters, receiverships and related commercial litigation. Having practiced in the insolvency and restructuring arena for decades, Mark has developed substantial experience representing secured creditors, debtors, committees and trustees in complex Chapter 11 proceedings, as well as business Chapter 7 matters and bankruptcy litigation. Much of his work involves sophisticated commercial reorganizations in which legal strategy, financial analysis and operational realities must align to achieve a successful result.

Bringing extensive courtroom and restructuring experience

Mark draws on his deep experience and keen insight to serve clients in both courtroom advocacy and strategic restructuring negotiations. Clients value his ability to quickly assess complicated situations, identify the evidence necessary to support their position, and prepare cases thoroughly for litigation when disputes arise. Nationally board-certified in business bankruptcy law by the American Board of Certification, Mark is known for assembling strong expert teams, developing clear evidentiary presentations, and approaching bankruptcy litigation with strategic organization and highly regarded credibility before the court.

Evaluating the feasibility of business reorganizations

Before recommending that a client pursue reorganization, Mark works closely with financial advisors and restructuring professionals to evaluate the company’s historical performance, projected cash flow, creditor structure and overall ability to sustain a workable plan of reorganization. He believes that successful Chapter 11 cases or out-of-court workouts begin with rigorous preparation and honest analysis rather than wishful thinking or delay tactics. As he often tells clients, “If it’s not going to work, don’t do it.” That practical philosophy has helped Mark develop a reputation for pursuing reorganizations only when the underlying business and financial realities support a successful outcome.

Managing restructurings with strategy and precision

Once a viable restructuring path has been identified, Mark collaborates extensively with bankruptcy financial advisors and expert witnesses to establish a clear strategic roadmap, cultivate the evidentiary record, and prepare the case for contested hearings if necessary. His experience allows him to quickly identify critical issues, assemble the right professionals, and organize complex matters in a way that gives clients the strongest possible footing in court.

Representing creditors in commercial insolvency matters

A significant portion of Mark’s practice also involves representing secured creditors in commercial bankruptcy and foreclosure matters involving income-producing properties and operating businesses. In these matters, he focuses on protecting collateral, preserving cash flow, and helping lenders navigate the operational and financial challenges that often arise when distressed borrowers remain in control of revenue-generating assets. Mark understands that successful creditor representation requires not only knowledge of bankruptcy law, but also a practical understanding of business operations, financial structures and the realities of commercial workouts and liquidations.

Employing receiverships and reorganizations to preserve value

In addition to traditional bankruptcy proceedings, Mark has built a successful receivership practice involving the liquidation of operating businesses. He frequently works on matters where preserving a company as “a going concern” creates substantially greater value than shutting down operations and liquidating assets piecemeal. The use of receiverships to facilitate the sale of a company as a going concern is often accomplished more efficiently than by traditional liquidating Chapter 11 proceedings. For Mark, some of the most rewarding cases are those in which a restructuring or sale process helps preserve jobs, stabilize a business, and benefit the surrounding community while maximizing value for creditors and stakeholders.

Experience

Counsel in Reported Cases*:

  • ACF 2006 Corp. v. Merritt, 557 Fed.Appx. 747, 82 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 784, (10th. Cir. (Okla.), 2014)
  • In re Latshaw Drilling, LLC., 481 B.R. 765, (Bankr.N.D.Okla.),
  • In re Atlas Computers, Inc., 433 B.R. 871 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2010)
  • In re Webb, 376 B.R. 765 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 2007)
  • In re Forest Hill, 364 B.R. 808 (Bankr. E.D. Okla. 2007)
  • In re ELRS Loss Mitigation, LLC, 325 B.R. 604 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2005)
  • Sheehan Pipe Line Const. Co. v. Laney Directional Drilling Co., 228 F.Supp.2d 1271, (N.D.Okla., 2002)
  • U.S. v. Kroblin, 2004 WL 1747467, 94 A.F.T.R.2d 2004-5180, 2004-2 USTC P 50,345 (N.D.Okla., 2004)
  • In re Wallace, 316 B.R. 743 (10th Cir.BAP 2004)
  • In re Wallace, 314 B.R. 904 (10th Cir.BAP 2004)
  • In re Tiger Petroleum Co., 319 B.R. 225 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 2004)
  • In re Wallace, 311 B.R. 601 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 2004)
  • In re Merrill, 246 B.R. 906 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 2000)
  • In re Tirey Distributing Co., 242 B.R. 717 (Bankr. E.D.Okla. 1999)
  • Smolen v. Hatley, 227 B.R. 757 (10th Cir. BAP, 1998), affirmed 194 F3d 1320 (10th Cir. 1999)
  • In re Hermann, 221 B.R. 944 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 1998)
  • In re Salina Speedway, Inc.,, 210 B.R. 851 (10th Cir. BAP 1997)
  • Diviney v. NationsBank, 211 B.R. 951 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 1997) affirmed 225 B.R. 762 (10th Cir. BAP, 1998)
  • Osborn v. Durant Bank & Trust Co. (In re Osborn), 24 F.3d 1199 (10th Cir. 1994)
  • Rich v. United States of America, ex rel Internal Revenue Service, 197 B.R. 692 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 1996), affirmed, slip. op. 97-CV-00775K, (N.D.Okla. 1997)
  • In Re Griffith, 194 B.R. 262 (Bankr. E.D.Okla. 1996)
  • In re Osborn, 176 Bankr. 217 (Bankr. E.D.Okla. 1994)
  • In re Osborn, 176 Bankr. 941 (Bankr. E.D.Okla. 1994)
  • In re Butler, 139 Bankr. 258 (Bankr. E.D.Okla. 1992)
  • In re Sevitski, 161 Bankr. 847 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 1993)
  • In re Manley, 135 Bankr. 137 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 1992)
  • Marx v. Reeds, 145 Bankr. 703 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 1992)
  • In Re Luker, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1539 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 1990)
  • In re Wood Comm. Fund I, Inc., 116 Bankr. 817 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 1990)
  • In re Threet, 118 Bankr. 805 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 1990)
  • In re Dodd, 97 Bankr. 74 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 1989)
  • In re Wiford, 105 Bankr. 992 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 1989)
  • In re Garrison, 108 Bankr. 760 (Bankr. N.D.Okla. 1989)
  • Matter of Jerry L., 662 P2d 1372 (Okla. Sup. Ct. 1983)
*Past results afford no guarantee of future results. Every case is different and must be judged on its merits.

Credentials

  • University of Tulsa College of Law, J.D., 1981
  • Southeastern Oklahoma State University, B.S., cum laude, 1979

  • Oklahoma
  • U.S. Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit
  • U.S. District Court Northern District Oklahoma
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District Oklahoma
  • U.S. District Court Western District Oklahoma
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District Texas
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District Arkansas
  • U.S. District Court Western District Arkansas
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District Wisconsin

  • Tulsa County Bar Association, member since 1986 – Bankruptcy and Reorganization Section
  • Oklahoma Bar Association, Bankruptcy and Reorganization Section, member since 1985; Board member (1985 – 1999); Chairman (1986 – 1987); Public Information Committee (1986 – 1988)
  • American Bankruptcy Institute, member since 1989; Membership Committee (Chairman, 1994 – 1998); National Membership Network Sub-Committee (Chairman, 1992 – 1993); Rules Committee, Technology Sub-Committee (1992 – 1993)
  • American Board of Certification – Chairman, 2001; President, 2000; Vice-President, (1996 – 1999); Board of Directors (1994 – 2001); (2010 – Present); Technology Committee Chair (2010 – Present; Faculty (1999 – 2001); Marketing Committee Chair (1995 – 1997); Standards Committee (1994 – 1997)
  • American College of Bankruptcy, Board of Regents

Honors & Awards

  • Fellow of the American College of Bankruptcy, Class of 2000
  • AV Preeminent rated by Martindale-Hubbell
  • Best Lawyers, Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights/Insolvency and Reorganization Law, Commercial Litigation, Litigation - Banking and Finance, Litigation - Bankruptcy, Mortgage Banking Foreclosure Law (2009 - Present)
  • Oklahoma Super Lawyers, Top 50 (2020)
  • Oklahoma Super Lawyers, Bankruptcy, Creditor Debtor Rights, Business Litigation (2006 - Present)
  • Earl Sneed Award of Outstanding Contribution to CLE, Okla. Bar Association, 1998
  • Meritorious Service Award, American Bankruptcy Institute, 1995
  • Distinguished Service Award, Tulsa County Bar Association, 1987
  • Best Lawyers, 2017 Lawyer of the Year (Tulsa) in Litigation - Bankruptcy
  • Best Lawyers, 2020 Lawyer of the Year (Tulsa) in Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights/Insolvency and Reorganization Law
  • Best Lawyers, 2021 Lawyer of the Year (Tulsa) in Litigation - Banking and Finance
  • Tulsa Top Lawyer, Tulsa People Magazine (2022)

Publications & Media

  • Panelist, “Issues Surrounding Bad-Faith Chapter 11 Filings and Current Trends,” 20th Annual Southeast Bankruptcy Workshop, July 24, 2015, Amelia Island, FL
  • “Bankruptcy Issues in Oklahoma Foreclosures,” National Business Institute, annually from 2006 through 2011
  • “Bankruptcy, Foreclosure and Real Property Title Issues,” National Business Institute, 2009
  • “Impact of Bankruptcy Reform and Consumer Protection Act on Creditor’s Rights in Consumer Cases under Chapter 7 and 13,” Oklahoma Credit Union League, 2005
  • “Creditor Issues in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy,” Oklahoma Bar Association, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2009
  • “Landlord/Tenant Issues in Bankruptcy,” Oklahoma Bar Association, 2004, 2005, 2010 and 2012
  • “Squeezing Blood from a Turnip, Bankruptcy issues, Oklahoma Bar Association, 2003
  • “Current Development in Article 9,” National Business Institute, 2003
  • “Basic Bankruptcy for Creditors,” National Business Institute, annually since 2000
  • “Small Business Reorganizations, 5th Annual Mid-South Bankruptcy Conference, University of Arkansas, Memphis, Tennessee, 1999
  • “Sanctions and Contempt Powers in Bankruptcy,” American Bankruptcy Institute’s Annual Meeting, 1998
  • “Agricultural Bankruptcy Issues,” American Bankruptcy Institute’s Rocky Mountain Bankruptcy Conference, 1998
  • “Which Chapter for Small Business, Chapter 11 or Chapter 13?” Tulsa County Bar Association, (Program Chair) 1997
  • “Family Law Issues in Bankruptcy,” National Business Institute, 1997
  • “Small Business Reorganizations,” University of Arkansas, CLE, 1997
  • “Creditor’s Rights in Bankruptcy,” Lorman Business Institute, annually since 1997
  • “Recent Developments in Bankruptcy Tax Issues,” Law Education Institute, Vail, Colorado, annually from 1997 through 2000
  • “Which Chapter for Small Business, Chapter 11 or Chapter 13,” Southeastern Bankruptcy Conference, Memphis, Tenn. 1997
  • “The 1994 Bankruptcy Reform Act,” Stetson University Law School, CLE, Tampa, Florida
  • “Discharge Issues Under Section 553 & Section 727,” Oklahoma City University, 1995
  • “Cash Collateral and Adequate Protection,” Oklahoma City University, 1995
  • “The Impact of the 1994 Bankruptcy Reform Act,” Oklahoma City University, 1995
  • “Recent Developments in Bankruptcy,” Annual Bankruptcy Retreat, Bankruptcy and Reorganization Section, OBA
  • “Small Business Chapter 11,” University of Tulsa, 1994
  • “Recent Developments in Bankruptcy,” Oklahoma City University, 1994
  • “Effect of Bankruptcy on Receiverships” and “Partnership Bankruptcy Issues,” National Business Institute, 1994
  • “Recent Developments in Bankruptcy,” Oklahoma City University, 1993
  • “Representing Debtors in Consumers Bankruptcy,” OBA, CLE, 1993
  • “Recent Developments in Bankruptcy,” Oklahoma City University, 1993
  • “Chapter 12 Farm Reorganization,” Farm Crisis Task Force, 1991
  • “Basic Chapter 7,” OBA, CLE, 1991
  • “Financing a Debtor in Chapter 12 Including Use, Sale or Lease of Collateral,” West Texas Bankruptcy Bar Association, Texas Tech University School of Law, 1991
  • “Criminal Considerations in Bankruptcy,” OBA, CLE, 1990
  • “Representation of Debtors in Bankruptcy,” Oklahoma Bar Assn. “OBA” CLE, 1990

 

 

 

 

Professional Experience

  • Board certified in Business Bankruptcy Law by the American Board of Certification since 1992