The Briefly Legal podcast delivers Crowe & Dunlevy’s candid conversations on all things legal mixed with humor, headlines and insight on current events. Send us your questions or suggest a topic to brieflylegal@crowedunlevy.com.

Join our mailing lists to receive new episode notifications via email—make sure to select Briefly Legal Podcast.

 

Listen to us on:
       

 

Recent Episodes

August 31, 2022

Upon Whose Shoulders We Stand: Crowe & Dunlevy Celebrates 120 Years of Legal Excellence

On Friday, August 26, 2022, Crowe & Dunlevy celebrated its 120th anniversary as a law firm. Founded by Charles Johnson five years before statehood, the firm is currently named for Vincil P. Crowe and Fred W. Dunlevy, who joined in 1929 and 1937, respectively, both instrumental in transforming the firm into a leading law firm in Oklahoma, and a strong supporter of the local community. The firm now has offices in Oklahoma City, Tulsa, Dallas, and Houston. Will Hoch,  Shareholder and Vice President of Marketing & Business Development, joins Briefly Legal to reflect on 120 years of legal excellence, and discusses the firm’s plans to recognize more than a century’s support from clients and the community by making contributions to charity, diversity, pro bono and community events over the next twelve months.

About Crowe & Dunlevy’s 120 Year Anniversary
About Crowe & Dunlevy’s Commitment to Social Responsibility

 


 

August 11, 2022

New and Non-Obvious: The Nuts-and-Bolts Episode on Patent Law

What is a patent? How do I get one? Are they expensive? Are they enforceable? Intellectual Property Practice Group Chair David M. Sullivan answers these questions and breaks down the requirements needed before filing an application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. David provides technical and practical insight into the application process starting with an inventor’s abstract idea, and ending with a formal patent application.

About David M. Sullivan

 


 

July 22, 2022

West Virginia vs. EPA Part II: U.S. Supreme Court Applies the Major Questions Doctrine to Limit EPA Regulatory Authority

On June 30, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 opinion that Congress did not give the EPA authority to set greenhouse gas emissions standards for existing power plants under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Energy, Environment & Natural Resources Practice Group member Donald K. Shandy returns to Briefly Legal to discuss the Court’s ruling and its application of the Major Questions Doctrine to limit EPA’s regulatory authority. He also discusses what the ruling means for administrative agency power more broadly, and the scenarios in which EPA can still regulate emissions under other sections of the CAA.

About Donald K. Shandy

Additional Resources: West Virginia vs. EPA: An Environmental Regulations Case with Broad Implications for Agency Power

 


 

June 29, 2022

PFAS Regulatory Update: EPA Issues Updated Drinking Water Health Advisories

On June 15, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued updated drinking water health advisory levels for four specific types of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Based on current analytical methods, the health advisory levels for two of these PFAS are below the level of detection and quantitation, and thus present certain difficulties to the regulated community. While the updated health advisories are intended to act as guidance and are not enforceable regulations, they send a strong signal that EPA intends to continue moving forward with the regulation of PFAS under the Safe Drinking Water Act and other federal environmental statutes. Join Energy, Environment & Natural Resources Practice Group member Tim Sowecke as he discusses the significance of the updated health advisory levels on the public and regulated community and how it fits into EPA’s broader strategy to regulate PFAS.

About Tim Sowecke

 


All Episodes

***

Nothing herein constitutes a guaranty, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Every case is different and must be judged on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Free background information available on request. Attorney advertising.